LSAT 159 | Section 4 | Reading Comprehension: Q24

RC Question 24 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: As it is described in the first paragraph, the “theory of everything” …

DISCUSSION: The passage says the theory of everything would only explain fundamental particles and their interactions, not how complex systems behave. The best analogy would be a theory in another field that tries to explain everything by looking only at the smallest individual units rather than larger patterns or systems.

___________

1. That’s about origins, not reduction to fundamental components.
2. This is actually close to the opposite of the passage’s issue: it acknowledges limits, rather than pretending fundamentals explain everything.
3. Tempting, but not quite it. This is choosing to exclude context, instead of reduction to fundamental components across all levels.
4. CORRECT. This mirrors the flaw: it reduces everything to micro-units and treats that as a full explanation, just like the “theory of everything” reduces reality to particles.
5. This just says languages share one fundamental structure. That’s about commonality, not about claiming total explanation via basic units.