LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 159 › Reading Comprehension › Section 4 › Question 5

LSAT 159 | Section 4 | Reading Comprehension: Q5

PT159.S4.P1.Q5

LSAT Preptest 159 explanations

RC Question 5 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Based on the passage, Gouges would most likely have held that …

DISCUSSION: Marriage is mentioned towards the end of the last paragraph. It says that Gouges thought that inequality kept women at a disadvantage in all relationships with men, including marriage, and this would continue until women were granted full rights and access. So, to her, beginning with marriage reform would treat only a symptom, not the source.

___________

  1. The issue isn’t the number of people involved in marriage, it’s that political power structures sustain inequality.
  2. Sure, but this likely applies to traditional institutions like patriarchy. She’s certainly not saying we shouldn’t fight at all because society will be resistant to it.
  3. Too narrow. Property rights are one example of inequality, but not the main reason she’d reject marriage as a starting point.
  4. CORRECT. Gouges saw political inequality as the foundation of all injustice against women, so without equal political power, marriage equality would be superficial.
  5. That’s Condorcet’s view, not Gouges’. She argued the opposite: that women’s inequality is the source of broader injustice, not a subset of it.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 159
Next Question

Section 4 · Reading Comprehension

Passage 1: Condorcet, Gouges and Women's Rights

Q1–Q6
  • Analysis
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Q5
  • 6

Passage 2: Sports and Arts

ComparativeQ7–Q14
  • Analysis
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14

Passage 3: Belize and Mayan Lands

Q15–Q21
  • Analysis
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21

Passage 4: Predictability

Q22–Q27
  • Analysis
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms