LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 17 › Logical Reasoning › Question 14

LSAT 17 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q14

LSAT Preptest 17 explanations

LR Question 14 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Between 1977 and 1987, the country of Ravonia lost…

QUESTION TYPE: Paradox

FACTS: Ravonia’s logging and wood processing industry lost jobs even though the total amount of timber cut increased.

ANALYSIS: Do lumberjacks cut wood with their bare hands? No, they use machines. Better machines can increase the amount of wood cut and reduce the number of lumberjacks needed.

That’s one possible explanation. The other explanation (and the right answer) is based on the fact that we’re talking about wood cutting and wood processing. It may be that only wood processing jobs were lost while wood cutting jobs increased.

Wood processing jobs could decrease because of technology. Or it could decrease because less wood is processed in Ravonia. We’re told that more timber is being cut but not how much wood is processed.

___________

  1. This is just a fact about the timber industry’s size. It doesn’t offer any explanation.
  2. This deepens the mystery. Ravonia produced more wood despite a drop in woodland. And they did it with less people. But how?
  3. CORRECT. This explains it. Wood production increases and so do wood cutting jobs. But wood processing jobs fall since more wood processing is done outside Ravonia.
  4. This doesn’t really affect anything. Once it comes time to sell wood products you’ve already cut and processed them. The work of the cutters and processors has already been done. This is different from answer choice C because here the wood processors may still have jobs domestically.
  5. This shows that it isn’t just woodworkers who are having tough times but it doesn’t explain anything.

Recap: The question begins with “Between 1977 and 1987, the country of Ravonia lost”. It is a Paradox question. Learn more about LSAT Paradox questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 17
Next Question

More Resources for Paradox Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Paradox questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers paradox questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms