LSAT 109 | Section 2 | Reading Comprehension: Q1

RC Question 1 Explanation

DISCUSSION: Remember that a good title should describe the whole passage.

___________

1. We’re not given any history. And the passage doesn’t say GNP’s meaning has changed.
2. This only describes the first half of the second paragraph. The argument is mainly focussed on attacking GNP. 
3. CORRECT. This sounds pretty good. The entire passage argues that human indicators are better. 
4. This only describes the second part of the second paragraph. 
5. What new method? The passage is arguing against using GNP; they likely don’t care how it’s calculated. We should focus on human indicators instead.