LSAT 126 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q11

LR Question 11 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Inez: The book we are reading, The Nature of Matterm is mistitled…

QUESTION TYPE: Most Strongly Supported

PARADOX: Inez thinks the title adequately describes only half of the book. Antonio thinks it is fine, because matter and energy are in fact closely related.

ANALYSIS: This reads like a Point at Issue question, so make sure you noticed it’s actually a most strongly supported question.

___________

1. No, to her this would be the same error. Inez probably would prefer the clunky title “The Nature of Matter and Energy.”
2. Antonio doesn’t go that far; he just says they’re closely related.
3. Inez might think they are related, just not so closely related that the current title is sufficient.
4. Neither of them has discussed the overall value of the book’s contents. They’re having a petty argument about the title.
5. CORRECT. This is it. Inez thinks that mentioning only matter gives a misleading impression, as half of the book is about energy.

Recap: The question begins with “Inez: The book we are reading, The Nature of Matterm is mistitled”. It is a Most Strongly Supported question. Learn how to master LSAT MSS questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.