LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 138 › Logical Reasoning › Question 14

LSAT 138 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q14

LSAT Preptest 138 explanations

LR Question 14 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Mayor: Our city faces a difficult environmental…

QUESTION TYPE: Paradox

PARADOX: The city has too much garbage; it will cause environmental damage.

Recycling could reduce the amount of garbage, but increase the environmental damage.

ANALYSIS: Normally we would expect recycling to reduce pollution. There are many possibilities.

Maybe people will produce more garbage if they can recycle. Maybe recycling plants produce pollution. Maybe the recycling program costs so much money that other pollution reduction efforts must be stopped.

On paradox questions it can help to prephrase, but it’s best to just open your mind to new possibilities that would explain how recycling would make pollution worse. The right answer is often surprising.

___________

  1. If the recycling vehicles cause less pollution, then that doesn’t help explain why the recycling program will cause damage.
  2. CORRECT. This could mean that recycling would reduce pollution by 10%, for example, but that recycling would block other projects that would have reduced pollution by 40%. So recycling hurt the effort to reduce pollution by preventing more useful projects.
  3. This explains why there is a garbage and pollution problem. It doesn’t explain why recycling will make the pollution problem worse.
  4. This sounds like it would reduce pollution. We need an answer that shows how recycling will increase pollution.
  5. This shows that recycling will encourage people to consume less. That should help reduce pollution.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 138
Next Question

More Resources for Paradox Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Paradox questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers paradox questions.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms