LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 138 › Logical Reasoning › Question 20

LSAT 138 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q20

LSAT Preptest 138 explanations

LR Question 20 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Scientist: Given the human tendency to explore and…

QUESTION TYPE: Method of Reasoning

CONCLUSION: There are low odds that humans will colonize the universe.

REASONING: If we colonized, most humans would be alive during the era of space colonization. We are not alive during this era, so it’s unlikely it will ever happen.

ANALYSIS: The author is attempting to make a probabilistic argument. The author’s error is that he hasn’t taken a random sample out of all humans that ever existed. He’s only looking at our time.

Imagine if you could survey all of human history and ask 1000 people at random from different times: ‘does space colonization exist?’. If they all say ‘no’, then it’s likely it never existed.

This method doesn’t work if you only survey your own time. It could just be that colonization hasn’t happened yet.

In terms of formal procedure, the argument says space colonization will never occur because a something that would probably accompany space colonization (a population explosion) hasn’t occurred yet.

___________

  1. Tempting, but the argument isn’t as simple as this. An example of this reasoning would be ‘He hasn’t arrived, therefore he never will’.
  2. This is a different error. To choose this answer you would have to be able to specify which premise was contradicted and why.
  3. This statement is way too broad. The argument is talking about space colonization, not all situations.
  4. CORRECT. The event that is likely is ‘we are alive during the era of colonization’. The given hypothesis is ‘space colonization’. So since we don’t live in an era of space colonization, it is unlikely space colonization will happen.
  5. This isn’t necessarily an error. For example, I’m confident in predicting that humans will still be breathing oxygen in 500 years.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 138
Next Question

More Resources for Method of Reasoning Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Method of Reasoning questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers method of reasoning questions.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Kritika says

    May 15, 2018 at 1:42 pm

    Hi, for E you say that this isn’t an error but the question doesn’t ask for an error. It asks for the method of reasoning. Can you explain why E is not correct?

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      September 23, 2018 at 3:56 pm

      When graeme says “error” in this case he’s referring to the error that the argument is meant to point out – the author is arguing that the hypothesis (some people believe that the galaxy will eventually be colonized by trillions of humans) is probably false. So E doesn’t work because it doesn’t address this very important component of the argument 
      -Reply from LSAT Tutor, Morgan Barrett

      Reply
  2. Frank says

    August 1, 2016 at 3:21 pm

    spelling error
    way “too” broad

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      November 5, 2016 at 9:50 pm

      Thanks for catching that! The page has been updated.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms