LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 130 › Reading Comprehension › Section 2 › Question 10

LSAT 130 | Section 2 | Reading Comprehension: Q10

PT130.S2.P2.Q10

LSAT Preptest 130 explanations

RC Question 10 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: The passage most strongly suggests that Emeagwali holds which one of the following views?

DISCUSSION: As with question 9, the passage will have a line reference supporting the right answer. Before picking one, you should check the passage to confirm it actually says what you think it says. Otherwise you risk making a mistake.

CODE: MSS line reference.

___________

  1. CORRECT. The second and third paragraphs support this. Emeagwali looked to trees and honeycombs for inspiration in designing parallel computers.
  2. This contradicts Emeagwali’s views. Lines 49-52 say Emeagwali plans to predict global weather 100 years from now.
  3. This goes too far. In paragraph 3 Emeagwali says he thinks natural systems will help design good technology. But he doesn’t say most technology will be inspired by nature.
  4. Emeagwali didn’t say this. He never mentions future prospects for parallel computers or how cheap they will get.
  5. This is silly. Emeagwali used tree branching for this purpose. But that doesn’t mean he thinks this is the only use of tree branching!
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 130
Next Question

Section 2 · Reading Comprehension

Passage 1: Archaeological Remains

Q1–Q7
  • Analysis
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Passage 2: Philip Emeagwali

Q8–Q13
  • Analysis
  • 8
  • 9
  • Q10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13

Passage 3: Tangible-Object Theory

Q14–Q20
  • Analysis
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16, no explanation yet
  • 17, no explanation yet
  • 18, no explanation yet
  • 19, no explanation yet
  • 20, no explanation yet

Passage 4: Musical Elements

ComparativeQ21–Q27
  • Analysis
  • 21, no explanation yet
  • 22, no explanation yet
  • 23, no explanation yet
  • 24, no explanation yet
  • 25, no explanation yet
  • 26, no explanation yet
  • 27, no explanation yet

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms