LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 130 › Reading Comprehension › Section 2 › Question 8

LSAT 130 | Section 2 | Reading Comprehension: Q8

PT130.S2.P2.Q8

LSAT Preptest 130 explanations

RC Question 8 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

DISCUSSION: The wrong answers here are not only not the main point, they aren’t true. Usually main point wrong answers will either contradict the passage or fail to be supported by it.

The main point is that Emeagwali developed parallel computing and used it to solve a problem. That’s about it.

___________

  1. We’re not told about what problems parallel computers have since solved. We’re only told that Emeagwali did solve oil flows, and might solve weather patterns.
  2. This goes way too far. In the third paragraph, Emeagwali suggests that parallel computers will help solve problems. But he never suggests that certain past problems could have been “easily solved” with natural paradigms.
  3. Lines 58-60 say that Emeagwali thinks that using natural paradigms will help us to understand natural systems. It didn’t say that Emeagwali has discovered the mathematical principles underlying all natural systems. He only used the mathematical principles underlying trees (lines 43-46). Someone else might have discovered those principles.
  4. CORRECT. This matches. The natural systems are trees (second paragraph) and honeycombs (third paragraph).
  5. This isn’t supported. Paragraph three says that Emeagwali hopes scientists will look to natural systems. But we don’t know if it actually is more likely that they will.
Passage Analysis
↑ Return to PT 130
Next Question

Section 2 · Reading Comprehension

Passage 1: Archaeological Remains

Q1–Q7
  • Analysis
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Passage 2: Philip Emeagwali

Q8–Q13
  • Analysis
  • Q8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13

Passage 3: Tangible-Object Theory

Q14–Q20
  • Analysis
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16, no explanation yet
  • 17, no explanation yet
  • 18, no explanation yet
  • 19, no explanation yet
  • 20, no explanation yet

Passage 4: Musical Elements

ComparativeQ21–Q27
  • Analysis
  • 21, no explanation yet
  • 22, no explanation yet
  • 23, no explanation yet
  • 24, no explanation yet
  • 25, no explanation yet
  • 26, no explanation yet
  • 27, no explanation yet

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms