LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 130 › Reading Comprehension › Section 2 › Question 11

LSAT 130 | Section 2 | Reading Comprehension: Q11

PT130.S2.P2.Q11

LSAT Preptest 130 explanations

RC Question 11 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Which one of the following most accurately describes the function of the first two sentences of the second paragraph?

DISCUSSION: The first two sentences show that oil flow modeling requires many simultaneous calculations. This makes them amenable to being modeled by parallel computers rather than supercomputers.

___________

  1. Nonsense. If this answer were true, it would mean that Emeagwali had said “Actually, oil flows aren’t that complex and don’t require simultaneous calculations.”
  2. CORRECT. Indeed. Supercomputers can only do calculations one at a time. So they are not well suited to modeling oil flow, which requires simultaneous calculations.
  3. It was the massively parallel computer that was designed according to the principles of tree branching. The first two sentences of paragraph 2 instead discuss the features of oil field flows.
  4. This is a throwaway reference to the third paragraph. Lines 58-61 say that Emeagwali believes using naturally inspired systems will help us to understand those systems.
    That has nothing to do with the start of the second paragraph. Those sentences describe a natural system that Emeagwali modeled. The model he used was the tree branching model.
  5. The paradigm shift is described in lines 58-61. It has nothing to do with the start of paragraph 2.
    In lines 58-61 Emeagwali was referring to using models like tree branches and honeycombs for inspiration. Those are his examples of a paradigm shift.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 130
Next Question

Section 2 · Reading Comprehension

Passage 1: Archaeological Remains

Q1–Q7
  • Analysis
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Passage 2: Philip Emeagwali

Q8–Q13
  • Analysis
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Q11
  • 12
  • 13

Passage 3: Tangible-Object Theory

Q14–Q20
  • Analysis
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16, no explanation yet
  • 17, no explanation yet
  • 18, no explanation yet
  • 19, no explanation yet
  • 20, no explanation yet

Passage 4: Musical Elements

ComparativeQ21–Q27
  • Analysis
  • 21, no explanation yet
  • 22, no explanation yet
  • 23, no explanation yet
  • 24, no explanation yet
  • 25, no explanation yet
  • 26, no explanation yet
  • 27, no explanation yet

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms