LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 130 › Reading Comprehension › Section 2 › Question 9

LSAT 130 | Section 2 | Reading Comprehension: Q9

PT130.S2.P2.Q9

LSAT Preptest 130 explanations

RC Question 9 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: According to the passage, which one of the following is true?

DISCUSSION: For a question like this, the answer will literally be said in the passage. When you pick an answer, you should quickly find the line reference in the passage to make sure you haven’t fallen into a trap. If you have a good map of the passage, this should take ten seconds or less.

CODE: MBT line reference.

___________

  1. This isn’t supported. Parallel computers are good for problems that require simultaneous calculations, like modeling oil flows. But it’s possible that there are some problems that sequential supercomputers are better at.
  2. We know Emeagwali solved an oil flow modeling problem, but we don’t know why he chose that particular problem.
  3. CORRECT. See lines 11-21. Emeagwali used a parallel computer to model oil flows, and until then only sequential computers had been used.
  4. This isn’t supported. Emeagwali did use nature, but the passage never said no one else did.
  5. This isn’t supported. Lines 11-15 say that Emeagwali pioneered the use of massively parallel computers. But someone else might have tried using small parallel processors to solve simpler real world problems.
    You can have parallel processing without massive computer networks.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 130
Next Question

Section 2 · Reading Comprehension

Passage 1: Archaeological Remains

Q1–Q7
  • Analysis
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Passage 2: Philip Emeagwali

Q8–Q13
  • Analysis
  • 8
  • Q9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13

Passage 3: Tangible-Object Theory

Q14–Q20
  • Analysis
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16, no explanation yet
  • 17, no explanation yet
  • 18, no explanation yet
  • 19, no explanation yet
  • 20, no explanation yet

Passage 4: Musical Elements

ComparativeQ21–Q27
  • Analysis
  • 21, no explanation yet
  • 22, no explanation yet
  • 23, no explanation yet
  • 24, no explanation yet
  • 25, no explanation yet
  • 26, no explanation yet
  • 27, no explanation yet

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms