LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 106 › Logical Reasoning › Question 2

LSAT 106 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q2

LSAT Preptest 106 explanations

LR Question 2 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: If the government increases its funding for civilian scientific…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: If the government increases it’s research funding, then the overall level of funding will decline.

REASONING: If the government increases funding, then private individuals and industries will decrease funding. They’ll no longer think research is their responsibility.

ANALYSIS: The argument is assuming that the increase in government funds won’t make up for the decrease in private funds.

We’re not told how large the government increase or the private decrease would be.

___________

  1. Actually, the argument seems to be assuming that it’s a good idea to have private individuals and industry bear some of the burden of research.
  2. CORRECT. If this isn’t true, then an increase in government funding will increase overall research funding – even if private funding declines.
  3. The argument was only predicting what private donors will do, and the conclusion was about the total level of funding available. It doesn’t matter whether scientists sometimes refuse to accept those funds.
  4. The author seems to like private funding, so I’m not sure why they would want to assume that multiple types of funding are bad.
  5. This would help the argument; increased government funding could never increase overall funding. Funding is already as high as it can be).
     
    But this isn’t necessary. It’s only necessary that overall funding could decrease if the government increases its funding.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 106
Next Question

More Resources for Necessary Assumption Questions

  • Negations Article: Learn about negations on the LSAT.
  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • Negations Drill: Practice your negation skills.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Necessary Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers necessary assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms