LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 142 › Reading Comprehension › Passage 1

LSAT 142, Section 3, RC Passage 1, Perfumes

LSAT Preptest 142 explanations

RC Passage 1 Explanation

This is an explanation for passage 1 of LSAT Preptest 74, the December 2014 LSAT. This passage is about perfumes. The author argues that perfumes should be considered as art because of their complexity.

This section has paragraph summaries and an analysis of the passage, links to the explanations for the questions are below.

Paragraph Summaries

  1. Why isn’t great perfume considered to be serious art form?
  2. Perfumes are similar to other arts. Painting combines natural and synthetic ingredients, just like perfumes do. Oil paintings used subtle materials and changed over time.
  3. Great perfumes are similarly subtle, and experienced noses can create imaginary worlds in their perfumes.
  4. Corporations cheapen perfume recipes to make profits. This may be one reason why perfumes are not taken seriously.

Analysis

This is an interesting passage about perfume. I have a lousy sense of smell, so I hadn’t even thought about whether perfume should be an art form. This passage makes a good case that perfume can reach the same aesthetic heights that other arts do.

The passage has a lot of small details you don’t really need to know. The most important thing is to know where the details are. So if, for example, a question asks something about oil painting, you know to look at the second paragraph.

Your more important job is to understand what the author thinks and why they tell us the things they do. The main idea is that the author truly likes perfumes. They consider them an art form as cultivated as painting, architecture, music, etc. (lines 7-10)

As such, perfume is worthy of analysis. Paragraphs 2 and 3 are an argument aimed at demonstrating that perfumes can be great art. The author tells us about oil painting in paragraph 2, then uses paragraph 3 to show how complex great perfumes can be.

The fourth paragraph offers one explanation why perfumes are ignored. The author has shown that it’s possible to create wonderful perfumes. However, most perfumes are not wonderful. Perfume manufacturers tamper with the ingredients to save money, and so most commercial perfumes fail to reach their potential.

↑ Return to PT 142
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms