DISCUSSION: It’s hard to predict the answer for this type of inference question. Just ensure you know the passage, details, and arguments well.
___________
- CORRECT. The author thinks that “treaties might incorporate explicit contingency plans” in the final paragraph, which would deal with the issue fo river flow fluctuations.
- The author never specifies what he thinks the ILC needs to do in cases where treaties don’t protect shared watercourses.
- The author doesn’t give an opinion on regulating entire river systems versus individual segments.
- Paragraph 2 says that the Draft Articles serve as guidelines for treaty creation. The author thinks that the Draft Articles aren’t flexible to accommodate changed water patterns, so we can infer that the treaties based off of them also aren’t.
- We don’t know what types of treaties countries favour.
Want a free Reading Comp lesson?
Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions
Leave a Reply