LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 137 › Logical Reasoning › Question 20

LSAT 137 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q20

LSAT Preptest 137 explanations

LR Question 20 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: A salesperson who makes a sale does not change the…

QUESTION TYPE: Complete The Argument

CONCLUSION: The argument will probably say that politicians try to convince voters that they will meet their already existing needs.

REASONING: Sales people don’t try to change customers’ needs. Instead they convince them that a product will meet their existing needs. Politicians are like salespeople.

ANALYSIS: Many complete the arguments use analogies. To answer these questions, think about the logic of the first situation, then apply that logic to the second.

Salespeople aren’t trying to change customers’ preferences. So politicians aren’t trying to change voters’ preferences. Instead politicians want to convince people that they offer what voters are looking for.

___________

  1. The argument never mentions political opponents or rival salespeople.
  2. Same as A.
  3. This is what politicians do not do. They do not try to change voters’ preferences. Instead, they try to convince voters that their policies match those preferences.
  4. Voters don’t care if politicians are interested in the same issues as them. They care whether politicians agree with voters on those issues, and whether politicians will make policies that voters support.
  5. CORRECT. Exactly. Salespeople convince customers that products match their needs, and politicians convince voters that they will enact the voter’s preferred policies.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 137
Next Question

More Resources for Complete the Argument Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Complete the Argument questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers complete the argument questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms