LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 3 › Logical Reasoning › Question 3

LSAT 3 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q3

LSAT Preptest 3 explanations

LR Question 3 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: In Europe, schoolchidlren devote time during each school day…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: North American children can be made physically fit only if they adopt a regime of calisthenics.

REASONING: European schoolchildren do calisthenics, and they are stronger, faster and longer winded than American children. American children do not do calisthenics.

ANALYSIS: This is a terrible argument. First, it makes a causation-correlation error. There could be some factor apart from calisthenics that explains the superior fitness of European children.

Second, even if calisthenics is responsible for the improvement, there are likely other ways for American schoolchildren to improve their fitness apart from calisthenics. The argument claims it is the only way.

___________

  1. The argument is restricted to schoolchildren, in America and Europe. It makes no claims about other children.
  2. Same as A.
  3. We have no idea. The stimulus didn’t mention superior overall health.
  4. CORRECT. If this isn’t true, then there might be other ways of matching European schoolchildren’s levels of fitness. The stimulus claims that calisthenics are the only way for North American schoolchildren to become as fit as Europeans.
  5. It isn’t necessary that they eat a better diet as long as calisthenics are enough to get North American schoolchildren fit.

Recap: The question begins with “In Europe, schoolchidlren devote time during each school day”. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn how to master LSAT Necessary questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 3
Next Question

More Resources for Necessary Assumption Questions

  • Negations Article: Learn about negations on the LSAT.
  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • Negations Drill: Practice your negation skills.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Necessary Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers necessary assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms