LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 103 › Reading Comprehension › Question 25

LSAT 103 | Section 4 | Reading Comprehension: Q25

LSAT Preptest 103 explanations

RC Question 25 Explanation

DISCUSSION: See lines 55-57. Staves didn’t destroy the Stones’ argument, but she weakened the idea that widows had more money than women who had never married.

___________

  1. CORRECT. Lines 55-57 say this exactly.
  2. Lines 55-57 say that Staves did not disprove the Stones’ contention.
  3. Same as B. Also, only one assumption was proven wrong.
  4. Same as B. Lines 55-57 say that Staves did not disprove the Stones’ contention.
  5. Staves didn’t qualify (modify) the Stones’ contention. She weakened it by showing one of their assumptions was wrong (lines 55-57).
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 103
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms