LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 113 › Logical Reasoning › Question 13

LSAT 113 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q13

LSAT Preptest 113 explanations

LR Question 13 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: When several of a dermatologist’s patients complained…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen – Exception

CONCLUSION: The dermatologist thinks that the rash was caused by telephones.

REASONING: The rashes were on the side of the face where the patients held their telephones.

ANALYSIS: It seems odd that telephones could cause rashes, since most people use telephones and don’t have rashes. The wrong answers all help show how some people could get rashes from phones.

The right answer just tells us that most people use telephones. We already knew that.

___________

  1. Allergenic plastic could explain the rashes.
  2. This helps rule out the possibility that some other device caused the rashes.
  3. This shows that telephones were used for long enough to cause a rash.
  4. CORRECT. So? Most people don’t have rashes from telephones. This information doesn’t help us blame telephones for the patients’ rashes. 
  5. This shows that the proposed cause (telephones) came before the proposed effect (rashes.)
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 113
Next Question

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Esther Adam says

    May 19, 2016 at 3:19 pm

    I chose B because I thought it didn’t provide additional support since it stated that the patients had contact between other devices. Thus, other devices are causing the rash not the telephone. I thought D- Strengthened it because since telephones are used by the industrialized world that’s probably why some of the patients are experiencing these rashes. Please provide me some feedback. Thank You.

    Reply
    • Graeme says Founder

      May 25, 2016 at 12:15 am

      B is wrong because the other devices were on both sides but the rash is only on one side. If other devices causes the rash, it would be on both sides.

      The quantity of telephone use in the world doesn’t matter. Only telephone use by the doctor’s patients matters.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms