QUESTION TEXT: Large-scale government projects designed to benefit everyone-such…
QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption
CONCLUSION: Government by referendum is worse for society.
REASONING: Big government projects usually benefit special interest groups the most, at first. Big projects are less likely to receive funding if power is equally distributed.
ANALYSIS: The argument is assuming that infrastructure projects are good, even if they benefit small groups at first.
___________
- CORRECT. If large projects never improve society then its not clear why there would be a disadvantage to government by referendum.
- The argument hasn’t shown that large scale projects will occur at all if the government doesn’t do them.
- The argument doesn’t make any claims about the democratic process.
- It doesn’t matter what the purpose of equal distribution of power is. It only matters that enhanced welfare will be not be an effect.
- It doesn’t matter if there are other ways. The argument just claims that this particular way will reduce welfare.
More Resources for Necessary Assumption Questions
- Negations Article: Learn about negations on the LSAT.
- Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
- Negations Drill: Practice your negation skills.
- LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
- Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
- Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Necessary Assumption questions.
- Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers necessary assumption questions.

Leave a Reply