DISCUSSION: On this type of question, first focus on eliminating several wrong answers. They decide between the remaining answers by supporting your choice using a detail from the passage.
___________
- We have no idea who controls training. Maybe the government or universities control training.
- CORRECT. Lines 49-53 support this. It says that people are excluded from power if they are excluded from legal discourse. The author treats legal discourse and power as being the same.
- We don’t know this. Lines 9-12 say that legal systems were always objective. If objective means abstract, then legal systems may have been just as abstract 300 years ago as they are today.
- Legal discourse has traditionally assumed that there is such a thing as a neutral observer. It’s modern psychologists who have denied that a neutral observer can exist (lines 18-23).
- Actually, traditional legal discourse assumes that most world-views are wrong. There is a single, objective truth. If you disagree with the objective truth, then your worldview must be wrong.
Want a free Reading Comp lesson?
Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions
Leave a Reply