LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 110 › Reading Comprehension › Question 21

LSAT 110 | Section 1 | Reading Comprehension: Q21

LSAT Preptest 110 explanations

RC Question 21 Explanation

DISCUSSION: All the answers talk about a woman, so that doesn’t help narrow things down. Remember that “social group” is for someone who doesn’t fall under the categories listed in lines 6-8.

We’re looking for someone being persecuted because she is a woman.

___________

  1. This person isn’t facing discrimination because she is poor. She may not even be facing discrimination (unequal treatment). Maybe almost everyone is poor and starving in that country. 
  2. Racial discrimination is explicitly prohibited, so there’s no reason for this women to apply under “social group”.
  3. Religious discrimination is explicitly prohibited, see lines 6-8.
  4. CORRECT. She is facing persecution for being part of a social group. Because she is a woman and is standing up for herself, she faces discrimination. 
  5. Political discrimination is explicitly prohibited, see lines 6-8. 
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 110
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Jay says

    October 22, 2016 at 9:51 pm

    Thanks for the explanations- they’re a killer resource!

    That said, I think I’d like to add to this one. According to the passage, the UNHCR report specifically states that the social group category should be used for women facing inhumane treatment for *violating social mores* (like arranged marriage).

    To simply say she is persecuted because she is a woman standing up for her rights seems a little overstated given the explicit specification of violating social mores by the passage.

    Hope it’s worth considering!

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      November 1, 2016 at 4:27 pm

      Your point is well-taken, however, arguments can be made for answering this question on the basis of two sections of the passage. We can answer it on the basis of lines 46-51, as you’ve pointed out. But, that doesn’t mean that the explanation overstates the case; it’s simply referring to the fact that women rejecting accepted norms in their countries re: arranged marriages are facing gender-based discrimination on the issue and consequently also fall under the category of a social group as it is defined in lines 37-45. It is specifically because she is a woman standing up for herself on this particular issue that she faces discrimination and persection.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms